This guy is saying that Obama is RIGHT and Reagan would be on OBAMA’S side.
“Reagan, who spent 16 years in government, actually said this:
“In the present crisis,” referring specifically to the high taxes and high levels of federal spending that had marked the Carter administration, “government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem.”
He then went on to say: “Now, so there will be no misunderstanding, it’s not my intention to do away with government. It is rather to make it work.” Government, he said, “must provide opportunity.” He was not rejecting government, he was calling — as Barack Obama did Tuesday — for better management of government, for wiser decisions.”
I think the author has a point to the degree that a lot of people these days create a caricature of Reagan and apply what they want to him, instead of really remembering what Reagan was.
I do not want to see another Ronald Reagan, because there won’t be another one. Someone in the future should be better than Reagan was.
Now I HALFWAY agree with this column. There needs to be a further push for ideas that I haven’t seen. Conservatism needs to get its intellectual side back and featured. Where I disagree with the article is in that government isn’t the problem. We have trillion dollar deficit budgets each year. That’s is the problem.
From Ronald Reagan’s first inaugural speech:
“Government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem…It is my intention to curb the size and influence of the federal establishment.”
That statement, in Ronald Reagan’s inaugural address on January 20, 1981, was the opening shot in what became known as the Reagan Revolution: small government, low taxes, de-regulation, a belief that the markets know best.
The revolution’s spirit shone through the 2008 platform of the Republican Party, presented at its convention early in September. “We do not support government bailouts of private institutions,” it said. “Government interference in the markets exacerbates problems in the marketplace and causes the free market to take longer to correct itself.
We believe in the free market as the best tool to sustained prosperity and opportunity for all.” I can’t help but think that if all the yahoos out there complaining about how the GOP has changed would invest even a tenth of that energy into trying to renovate it back to what it was, maybe we could see some real good done for this country.
In other word, my message to those people is – if you’re not willing to help rebuild it, then just shut up and go away. You’re not doing anyone a bit of good.
Would Reagan recognize this GOP? Yes he would.Ask Gerald Ford. And he would organize an effort to defeat it like we are trying to do at Primary Challenge.
One thing I have noticed in the past and very much in the last few days: when Democrats get elected, they move quickly to fulfill their promises to their base(s); when Republicans get elected, they go to meetings and seminars and learn how to “reach out to the rest of the country and across the aisle to get things done.”
I am so very sick of that kind of behavior that it makes going to the polls and voting a maximum effort, when one realizes that everything that your candidate said he/she wanted to achieve, will disappear as quickly as though it was written in invisible ink.
Reagan wouldn’t recognize this GOP
The Gipper may be the patron saint of Limbaugh and Coulter, but he’d be amazed at what’s been done in his name. By Mickey Edwards January 24, 2009 In my mind’s eye, I can see Ronald Reagan, wearing wings and a Stetson, perched on a cloud and watching all the goings-on down here in his old earthly home. Laughing, rolling his eyes and whacking his forehead over the absurdities he sees, he’s watching his old political party as it twists itself into ever more complex knots, punctuated only by pauses to invoke the Gipper’s name.
It’s been said that God would be amazed by what his followers ascribe to him; believe me, Reagan would be similarly amazed by what his most fervent admirers cite in their desire to be seen as true-blue Reaganites. On the premise that simple is best, many Republicans have reduced their operating philosophy to two essentials: First, government is bad (it’s “the problem”); second, big government is the worst and small government is better (although because government itself is bad, it may be assumed that small government is only marginally preferable). This is all errant nonsense. It is wrong in every conceivable way and violative of the Constitution, American exceptionalism, freedom, conservatism, Reaganism and common sense.
(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com …