shelly_silver_puppets.gif

It’s all about Silver and the Assembly and their relationship with the unions… They should change their name from assembly to The House of Union’s. They represent the biggest lobbying group in the state, their pockets are lined, the campaign warchests filled, their campaign workers are supplied, mailings, literature drops and signatures collected by the unions, the very same unions that claim any cuts will devastate this state. Devastate, it will fall apart at the seams and collapse if we don’t raise taxes on the rich.

Why are we in such a fiscal crisis? Look at the last Pataxme budget… 111 Billion, what was the first Spitzer budget? 123 Billion…. That is a 12 billion dollar growth in one year, one year.

God help us if the democrats take over the senate. Think we have high taxes now? Think that a 4% property tax cap is good? It should be 1%, the democrats want more and more and more and more… and on top of that a circuit breaker, just in case they need more, it will trip and while we are falling and money dumps out of pocket they can collect the last penny.

Oh what is Shelly and his puppets going to do?

Tough Week Awaits Silver With a Choice on Taxes - August 11, 2008 - The New York Sun

The Democratic speaker of the Assembly, Sheldon Silver, this week will face one of the toughest political decisions of his career: whether to side with Governor Paterson, a fellow Democrat, in passing a cap on property taxes, or protect his relationship with the state’s most powerful labor unions.

Mr. Paterson and the state’s other legislative leader, Senate Republican Dean Skelos, are urging Mr. Silver and Assembly Democrats to approve legislation that would impose a 3% to 4% ceiling on property tax increases in suburban areas and upstate school districts.

It’s hardly unusual for Mr. Silver to be the odd man out. In his 14 years as speaker, he has flourished in the role by conserving bargaining leverage and holding out for concessions.

When the Legislature comes to Albany next week for a special session, Mr. Silver will be presented with a more difficult balancing act. At stake is his relationship with Mr. Paterson and interest groups that Mr. Silver has relied on as a crucial base of support.

For Mr. Silver, 64, the dangers are more elevated than usual. Next month, he faces his first primary contest in more than two decades, as he squares off against two opponents.

Mr. Silver, who represents a district in Lower Manhattan, has said he would consider supporting a tax cap if he could be assured that it would not jeopardize funding for public schools.

Public opinion polls have indicated that most New Yorkers favor capping property taxes. The measure won the backing of Senate Republicans on Friday and has limited support from Assembly Democrats in districts outside the city.

Most problematic for the speaker, a cap has emerged as one of the highest priorities of the state’s top Democrat, Mr. Paterson, who since taking office in March has sought to position himself as a fiscal moderate.

Ostensibly, Mr. Paterson’s purpose in calling a special session of the Legislature is for lawmakers to focus attention on driving down next year’s budget deficit. Political observers say, however, that the governor’s primary objective is to achieve passage of a cap, a big item that the administration believes will resonate with voters when Mr. Paterson runs for office in two years.

Mr. Silver is facing considerable pressure from his New York City members and organized labor groups, which have long been a vital source of political money and manpower for Assembly Democrats. They are demanding that the speaker turn his back on the governor’s proposal, criticizing it as a misguided policy that will leave school districts under-funded.

The rallying cry against the cap is being led by New York State United Teachers, the state’s largest teachers union, which is poised to announce its endorsements for the upcoming legislative races.