Excellent article by Pat Buchanan… This is waht I heve been talking about. The disadvantage we have has been growing and growing since the 90’s when nafta, gatt and the rest were signed. Why do we keep our exports at a disadvantage?
The Federal government was originally funded by tariffs on imports. It appears that all that has been flipped upside down. We tax exports and the taxpayers are now supporting the Federal government. Government at all levels has grown to an unsustainable rate, trade deficits continue to grow. It is far past the time that we become more of an isolationalist nation again.
We cannot survive like this.
New Deal for U.S. Manufacturers by Patrick J. Buchanan
In July, our trade deficit hit yet another all-time record, $68 billion, an annual rate of $816 billion. Imports surged to $188 billion for the month, as our dependency on foreigners for the vital necessities of our national life ever deepens.
China’s trade surplus with us was $19.6 billion for July alone, moving toward an all-time record of $235 billion for 2006 — the largest trade deficit one country has ever run with another. Our deficit with Mexico is running at an annual rate of $60 billion. With Canada, it is $70 billion. So much for NAFTA. With the European Union, it is running at $160 billion.
America as the most self-sufficient republic in history is history. For decades, U.S. factories have been closing. Three million manufacturing jobs have disappeared since Bush arrived. Ford and GM are fighting for their lives.
While the United States has a corporate income tax, our trade rivals use a value-added tax. At each level of production, a tax is imposed on the value added to the product. Under the rules of global trade, nations may rebate VAT levies on exports, and impose the equivalent of a VAT on imports.
Assume a VAT that adds up to 15 percent of the cost of a new car in Japan. If Toyota ships 1 million cars to the United States valued at $20,000 each, $20 billion worth of Toyotas, they can claim a rebate of the VAT of $3,000 on each car, or $3 billion — a powerful incentive to export. But each U.S. car arriving at the Yokohama docks will have 15 percent added to its sticker price to make up for Japan’s VAT.
This amounts to a foreign subsidy on exports to the United States and a foreign tax on imports from America. Uncle Sam gets hit coming and going. It is as though, after firing a round of 66 in the Masters, Tiger Woods has five strokes added to his score for a 71, and five strokes are subtracted from the scores of his rivals. Even Tiger would bring home few trophies with those kind of ground rules.
The total tax disadvantage to U.S. producers — of VAT rebates and VAT equivalents imposed on U.S. products — is estimated at $294 billion.
Exported U.S services face the same double whammy. A VAT equivalent is imposed on them, while the exported services of foreign providers get the VAT rebate. Disadvantage to U.S. services: $85 billion annually.
Why do our politicians not level the playing field for U.S. companies?
How could we level the playing field? Simple. Impose an “equalizing fee” on imports equal to the rebates. Take the billions raised, and cut taxes on U.S. companies, especially in production. Create a level playing field for U.S. goods and services in foreign markets, and increase the competitiveness of U.S. companies in our own home market by reducing their tax load.
U.S. trade deficits would shrivel overnight. And jobs and factories lately sent abroad would start coming home.
Isn’t it time we put America first — even ahead of China?
Bingo! Pat nails it right there.


3 users commented in " New Deal for U.S. Manufacturers "
Follow-up comment rss or Leave a Trackback“Three million manufacturing jobs have disappeared since Bush arrived.” Bingo! Lay the blame where it belongs, with George Bush and the Republican Congress.
I don’t into buy this plan one bit as a panacea to bringing back jobs to the U.S.
A VAT is a euphemism for national sales tax on consumers. It would only serve to raise prices on domestically produced as well as imported goods. It would be another screwing to the poor and middle class.
It doesn’t address the real problems that affect the competitiveness of U.S. companies in the world market.
1.) U.S. corporate taxes + regulations + federal and state mandates + compliance costs amounts to an equivalent of corporate taxes of over 45%, considerably higher than our major trading partners. It’s no wonder that most of the U.S. tax code is dedicated to loopholes to counteract some of this expense, another waste of time and money, the IRS.
2.) Our bloated government spends so much of the wealth of this country in subsidizing domestic and foreign enterprises, government boondoggles, foreign governments and foreign military adventurism. Corporate welfare subsidies (including so-called foreign aid) is just another stealth tax on the back of the U.S. taxpayer.
3.) Deficit spending, money printing and borrowing is taxing U.S. workers, investors and companies even more by the greatest of all stealth taxes, INFLATION.
Buchanan’s idea about cutting taxes in the U.S. are a good thing, but you’d have to cut out a lot more things first to make it truly effective. I’m surprised he didn’t mention them.
Alot of good points, Ray. As to “everything is Bush’s fault,”
weren’t NAFTA and GATT signed under Clinton? Sorry to
break the news, but these things don’t happen overnight.
Leave A Reply