New York’s property taxes are too high.
New York’s property taxes are too high. Albany and localities are both to blame
by Robert B. Ward,

Almost everyone knows by now that New York’s taxes are too high. Where, exactly?

One major problem, certainly, is our heavy property-tax burden. The latest Census figures show property taxes in New York averaged $1,328 per resident in 2000. That cost was fourth-highest in the country, and 50 percent above the national average.

About 62 percent of the $27.5 billion in property taxes collected statewide in 2001 went to public schools, including those in New York City, according to the Office of the State Comptroller.

New York City (not including its schools) and other cities around the state accounted for another 13 percent, and the 57 counties represented 12 percent, of the total property-tax burden. Towns, villages and special districts collected and spent the rest.

High property taxes raise the cost of doing business in the Empire State, thereby driving jobs elsewhere. They also drive up housing costs for New Yorkers of all income levels (including those who rent).

State government policies on Medicaid, school spending and public employees are partly to blame for high local spending and the high local taxes that result. But it’s also true that local practices in those areas differ, with varying costs for taxpayers.

Many unions and other pro-spending lobbies argue that higher state aid to schools and municipalities is the answer to high property taxes. In 2003, the Legislature bought that argument and imposed big tax increases at the state level, in large part to generate more money for local governments and school districts.

Senators and Assembly members said their tax increases would avert big increases in property-tax bills. Many editorial writers agreed. For instance, Newsday , whose readers were hit especially hard by Albany’s income-tax increases, said the state-level tax hikes would “protect local property taxpayers.” Civic groups on Long Island joined in the chorus.

But it didn’t work.

School districts boosted spending at twice the inflation rate. As a result, school taxes went up sharply – by an average 8.6 percent in Newsday ’s territory, for instance.

Legislators also said higher state tax increases would protect the Medicaid program and the county governments that pay part of the Medicaid bill. But property taxes in most counties also rose, many at double-digit rates.

Overall state aid to localities and school districts rose 29 percent from 1996 to 2001, according to the Office of the State Comptroller. That was twice the inflation rate. Yet local property taxes still jumped by a total of $3.5 billion.

Continually expanding payrolls are one reason. In the two-year economic slowdown after the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, state government trimmed its payroll. But local governments statewide added 13,000 jobs.

Indeed, the public-employee unions that claim higher state taxes lead to lower local taxes use their lobbying clout to make sure it seldom actually happens. Instead, they push to use state aid for more local jobs, and higher wages and benefits.

Both state and local officials must work to control local-government spending. That’s the only way we’ll ever reduce our heavy property-tax burden.
PROPERTY TAXES PER CAPITA,
2000
NYS $1,328
Illinois $1,168
Michigan $ 956
U.S. avg. $ 885
Pennsylvania $ 820
California $ 775
North Carolina $ 572

By Robert B. Ward, Director of Research, The Public Policy Institute of New York State

FYI…